25x25m is not very big, but avoidance of the wet slab is closely linked to the skiing ability. If caught in the slide the likelihood of injury is great and even a more severe outcome could be the consequence
If it goes terrain trap, despite shallow slab destructive potential is significant
I would assume having the addtional decision points would be where there are terrain features that would break up the slope.
To   low slope angle
depth of 30 to 60 cms affects  the outcome
but if it did run, could be  ugly
terrain trap will increase the issue

I wouldn space the skiers because the snow is most likely quiet hard and the fall of one skier would have less consequence (pulling mor skiers along)
corn snow conditions are very safe to ski steeper slopes, despite the rain assuming that the crust is not softening
woudl not be good skiing
not steep and solid crust, in the shade, skiing spaced out due to terrain trap
If they are expert skiers!
if the sun is out and the sfc has broken down, no thanks
I would probably not enter a slope where the upper 30cm is wet. If it were 10cm, that might be different. Still have a hard time getting a picture of the conditions.
I base this on the fact there is a 15-20 cm layer of solid crust which I would feel is supportive. The fact it is raining would make me want to spread out and manage people one at a time.
given  that it is frozen, but if it is melted I would not feel comfortable
given the terrain trap and the prevous activity, not today
From experience for the majority of groups the risk of skier collisons warrants spacing out even in low avalanche hazard
steep terrain with a slightly refrozen sfc is hazardous terrain for guiding regardless of avalnche hz
Again this entirely dependant on the state of the supporting crust

I find it hard to imagine a weak layer producing whumphs and cracks but not test score results or fracture character. It would be very concerning to have these field obs.
increasing load due to rise in temps
Signs of persistant slabs are a relevant sign of instability...even if a few days old
this weakness mau wake up with the temp rise
no slab yet, it is coming
I don't think I've ever seen a scenario where the weakness is that deep yet produces whoomfs and cracks. I would expect a lot of bridging at that depth
how much bridging is there?
but hightly untrustworthy
even thought slabs are older than yesterday rapid rise in temps tips the balance
for PWL the slabs yesterday still make me nervous, then combine the rapid warming make me go this is more serious
its 150 com down but where getting some whumpfs, then add warming..
slabs yesterday, it's still hot, add temps and solar radn...
what is the density of the HN and HST?
The first 2 obs are inconsistent. Whumpfs would be a sign of the persistent slab.
again easy test results with rp is not very real.