The varying slope angle with some tree islands as well as the absence of any wind effect in a wind slab situation should make this manageable if you can avoid the terrain trap. Also the concave shape is favourable.
If there is no wind slab here and the slope is in the mid 20 degree range, I think you could travel over a terrain trap even if the slope is unsupported. Not sure how these characteristics require "Full commtment"
Not sure how a 20-30 degree slope with no terrain trap can be unsupported
Mature timber and moderate steepness make it more favorable, terrain traps make it less
shallow HS,full commitment and terraintraps are not a good combination, the unly thing in favour is the angle
I have to aasume there are no dangwrous slopes above, therefore slope size is inconsequential
I'm confused by the slope angle being less than 20 degrees yet capable of avalanche 300m x 300m
again - how protected is it from the wind in question
rating only with respect to avalanche hazard.
again it's the terrain trap, I just don't like skiing around them
can't we go anywhere without these god damn terrain traps, agian I don't think its steep enough
the terrain trap again

Its not steep, the only reason to even consider it
If I assessed this slope as very favourable than I wasn't thinking about the importance of terrain characteristics at all.
sunlight is a tough one - time of season, and day, make huge differences. Rating could range from 1 to 4.
How does a 20 degree slope require full commitment and contain a terrain trap?
Most windward slopes in this hemisphere are also effected by sun. How does a 20 degree or less slope produce this size of avalanche?
Again, I can't picture a piece of terrain that has mature timber is less than 20 degrees being capable of having a terrain trap and requiring full comment. Maybe a sink hole?
for wind slabs the propergate less, so terrain t rap does not matter here
again mature timber and wind slabs, protected from wind
20 degrees lets go skiing no mattter what the wind slab conditions