The puzzeling factor is the absence of any test results,
the puzzle again is the absense of test scores, obviously somewhat unrealistic
persistant shears but no naturals, additional triggers needed
Somewhat unrealistic with over 60cm of HN24, could be the dream day but whats about the exposure
Dense wind slab and windslabs frome yesterday.. yet no or isolated signs of recent wind transport? and 60cm HN sounds spooky
It seems odd to find signs of natural activity in this case.   (1st statement)
the solar radiation may shortly settle the slab and change fracture characteristics to sudden planar
I am assuming the cracks/whumphs are in the thin breakable surface wind slab and the test results refer to the thin wind slab and not the layer down 90-120.
I would have expected stability test results at the interface given your set of conditions and the field signs
test results might change quickly with the rising temps
A very small amount of wind might be the tipping point here
assuming the slabs are elsewhere as its only a thin slab/skin, but lost of snow recently makes me concerned
Not sure if you mean wind slabs that have released in 'signs of'... or signs of windslabs (which is similar to point 9)
Easy to very easy with RP not likely.
I don't seem to follow the obs well, what I understand is there are no recent slides, but there is cracking and whumping, no wind transport so no wind slab just a hst type slab on a bad interface with rising temps
stability is likely det with rise in temp
this doesn't make sense how could you have a hard wind slab and have had +60cms hst past 24 with no wind, that would mean any wind slab would be down 60cms and couldn't produce a drum like sound, sorry pascal I can't answer this, i'll put somewhat serious and mpve on
"wind slabs from today" not consistent with "no or isolated signs of transport"

This sounds more like an issue with rapid destabilization of the surface with new snow and warming as well as solar effect and less to do with windslabs.
I cant help but ignore the windslab part of the assesment which seems somewhat moot ( not serrious ) in deference to the potential oveloading of a deeper layer(more serios)
Suspicious of the conditions given the HN24
the layer down 90-120 is less relevant to the current wind slab assessment but is relevant for a deeper propogation, but you are not asking about that.
Not sure how there can be "signs of windslabs from today"  but "no or only isolated signs of recent wind transport??
Why the 'thin wind crust' if 'no or only isolated signs of wind'?
I notice that I am always rating sun effects lightly. I am not sure this is always accurate. Sun is only significant if on or exposed t0 sun facing slopes. The I am thinking that if it is a factor it is not because I will be avoiding those slopes. If that makes sense!
rapid rising temps is the big one for
assuming windslab is not on weak interface, but dry loose snow below windslab is on weak interface